• Contact
29 / 09 / 2023
International Coalition for Papua
  • News
  • About Papua
  • Human Rights Report
    • Quarterly Reports
    • 2021
    • 2019
    • 2017
    • 2015
    • 2013
    • 2011
    • 2009
    • Genocide Report
  • Resources
    • International Law
      & Norms
    • National Laws
    • Political History
No Result
View All Result
International Coalition for Papua
  • News
  • About Papua
  • Human Rights Report
    • Quarterly Reports
    • 2021
    • 2019
    • 2017
    • 2015
    • 2013
    • 2011
    • 2009
    • Genocide Report
  • Resources
    • International Law
      & Norms
    • National Laws
    • Political History
International Coalition for Papua

Cooperation between the Archdiocese of Merauke and palm oil company causes outrage

17.11.2021
in 2021
Reading Time: 4 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

UCA News has reported that the Merauke Archdiocese in Indonesia’s Papua province is set to receive billions of rupiah through a collaboration with an environmentally controversial palm oil company, sparking strong protests from local Catholics. Protesters said they felt marginalized by the presence of the palm oil company, PT Tunas Sawa Erma, and its deforestation, saying this cooperation showed that the archdiocese is insensitive to their struggles.

Archbishop Petrus Canisius Mandagi signed an letter of intent on 5 January with the manager of the firm, a subsidiary of the Korindo Group, and a joint Indonesian and South Korean venture. The company handed over 800 million rupiah (US$56,600), part of a 2.4 billion rupiah commitment to be given in stages over three years. The company will also give the archdiocese 20 million rupiah a month for three years. Jimmy Yonesendu, the company’s general manager, said the donation was part of their corporate social responsibility strategy. Korindo Group has been accused of destroying a huge swath of rainforest in Merauke district to pave the way for a palm oil plantation.

According to a joint report released by Greenpeace Indonesia and Forensic Architecture in November, Dongin Prabhawa, one of its subsidiaries, had destroyed 57,000 hectares of rainforest, based on their findings on forest fires captured on NASA satellite imagery between 2011 and 2016.

Archbishop Mandagi said his archdiocese needed financial contributions from various parties including palm oil companies to fund services, including the construction of its minor seminary. However, he said, the Church will continue to work with palm oil companies to ensure they prioritize and maintain environmentally sustainable practices”. Companies can work, but they must pay attention to the sustainability of the environment for the sake of our children and grandchildren,” Archbishop Mandagi was quoted by Penakatolik.com as saying.

Meanwhile, Frederika Korain, a human rights lawyer, said the archdiocese’s move shows that the Church is insensitive to Papuans who have lost land due to the expansion of palm oil plantations in recent years. “Conflicts often occur due to the presence of palm oil companies in Papua, including in Merauke Archdiocese,” she told UCA News on Jan. 12. She said Archbishop Mandagi, who has only been in his position for a few months, “must learn to see what Catholics are experiencing.” “It’s sad because while his flock is struggling against companies that are destroying Papua’s nature, the Church is instead on the company’s side,” she said.

“More than that, the Church’s move contradicts the mission echoed by Pope Francis to save the earth as conveyed in Laudato si’, including how to save indigenous peoples,” said Korain, who once worked for the Justice, Peace and Integrity of Creation (JPIC) Commission of Jayapura Diocese.

Korneles Siep, a Catholic activist, said the agreemtn has angered locals who are campaigning against forest destruction in Papua. “The independence of the Catholic Church will be lost. The Church is the last hope for Papuans amid worries about the future,” he said. He added the agreement provides a kind of legitimacy for the companies to continue exploiting the forest. “At the same time, Papuans are increasingly becoming lost sheep, ignored by their shepherds,” he said.

Meanwhile, Father Anselmus Amo, Chairman of Merauke Archdiocese’s JPIC Commission, who was present at the signing, said that “in principle, the archdiocese wants to work with anyone to help its flock.” Dialogue with companies, he said, is the best way to engage. “Dialogue is one of the options for advocating, in addition to other options that have been made by JPIC so far,” he told UCA News..

“The Archbishop’s support for palm oil companies aims to advance the interests of many people, including the rights of indigenous peoples and environmental sustainability, under business and human rights provisions.”

See original article here.

Tabloid Jubi has published an article on the topic, interviewing with environmentalist Agustinus Mahuze on the same topic (original version in Bahasa Indonesia)

“Frankly, I am very disappointed. So far, we have seen that the Archdiocese of Merauke (KAME) has contributed against payment, but ultimately succumbed to the palm oil company”, said an environmentalist in Merauke, Agustinus Mahuze, when met by Jubi on 12.1.2020 (see photo). Agustinus reiterated that when KAME collaborates with companies, it automatically supports their type of investment in South Papua.

“We know that the Secretariat for Justice and Peace of Merauke’s Archdiocese (SKP KAME) is very critical about the presence of palm oil investors in Merauke. However, with such cooperation, the church has gone againts what its people have been fighting for so far”, said Agus Mahuze. “It is certain that the Catholic Church will remain silent regarding the investment scheme put up by investors tearing apart the forests of the Papuan people for business activities,” he said. “And in the future, who will keep on believing in church institutions again? The church has a gray-area attitude towards investing in Merauke. Especially indigenous Marind people in the villages are asking themselves why is the true Catholic church there. That is a fundamental question that the diocese must answer”, he criticized.

Asked whether the cooperation could be canceled, Agustinus admitted that his environmental movement does not have the authority to intervene in that forum. But he asked the diocese to reconsider their decison.

He also questioned why, before the cooperation was decided, there was no communication with the people in the area and other related actors. In that way, the Archbishop of Merauke, Mgr. Petrus Canisius Mandagi, MSC would have received input for consideration. “Why do I say that, because all this time the voice to fight for and to speak out loudly against the investment of oil palm companies in Merauke came from Merauke Archdiocese,” he said.

Previously, the Archbishop of Merauke, Mgr. Petrus Canisius Mandagi, MSC expressed his gratitude for the assistance provided by PT Tunas Sarwa Erma. The assistance is intended for people in South Papua. “We, the Merauke Archdiocese, are not rich, so we need funds. If a region wants to advance, it certainly needs investment. Many people are anti-investment, but they also eat from the profits in inverstment here” he said.

Previous Post

Human Rights Update West Papua – 4th Quarter 2020

Next Post

Top Indonesian palm oil developments in 2020

Related Post

Man shot down as police disperse crowd in Timika – Relatives demand compensation

22.12.2021

Human Rights Update West Papua – 1st Quarter 2021

06.12.2021
Update on criminalisation of Victor Yeimo – Lawyers demand immediate release

Update on criminalisation of Victor Yeimo – Lawyers demand immediate release

17.11.2021

Category

  • 2013
  • 2014
  • 2015
  • 2016
  • 2017
  • 2018
  • 2019
  • 2020
  • 2021
  • About Us
  • Biennial Report
  • CCPR Review 2013
  • CESCR Review 2014
  • Human Rights Report
  • International Law & Norms
  • National Laws
  • News
  • Political History
  • Quarterly Reports
  • Resources
  • Special Reports
  • Uncategorized

Tags

new (17)

ABOUT PAPUA

West Papua is the western half of the New Guinea island and comprises the two eastern-most Indonesian Provinces (Province Papua & Province Papua Barat). After decades of transmigration from other parts of Indonesia, the indigenous Melanesian population makes up less than 40% of the population.

Links

  • News
  • About Papua
  • Human Rights Report
  • Resources

Instagram Feed

    Go to the Customizer > JNews : Social, Like & View > Instagram Feed Setting, to connect your Instagram account.

Recent Post

Update on legal processes in relation to attack on military post in Maybrat – Lawyers call upon judges to acquit juvenile defendant

Update on law enforcement process in relation to attack on military post in Maybrat – six defendants transferred to Makassar for trial

31.12.2021
18 September 2021 marks end of palm oil moratorium in Indonesia – NGOs demand extension

Palm oil company PT Subur Karunia Raya alleged of breaching multiple laws in Teluk Bintuni

31.12.2021

© 2021 ICP - Webdesign by ➤ digitaleformate

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Human Rights Report
    • Quarterly Reports
    • 2019
    • 2017
    • 2015
    • 2013
    • 2011
    • 2009
    • Genocide Report
  • Resources
    • International Law & Norms
    • National Laws
    • Political History
  • About Us

© 2021 ICP - Webdesign by ➤ digitaleformate

Manage Cookie Consent
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
Preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Skip to content
Open toolbar Accessibility Tools

Accessibility Tools

  • Increase TextIncrease Text
  • Decrease TextDecrease Text
  • GrayscaleGrayscale
  • Links UnderlineLinks Underline
  • Readable FontReadable Font
  • Reset Reset